EW Academy · Contents · Chapter 12 · §12.1 · Nederlandse versie

§12.1 Introduction

Open §12.1 in the academy

Electronic Protective Measures (EPM, Electronic Protective Measures) are all the measures that keep your own systems working when the opponent uses the techniques from Electronic Counter Measures. Much EPM has already been covered "along the way", because good radar design choices are EPM: PRI jitter against RGPI and cover pulses (PRI modulation), pulse compression with matched filtering against non-coherent jammers (Pulse compression and pulse integration), CFAR against noise saturation (Threshold, Constant False Alarm Rate and Automatic Gain Control), monopulse against inverse gain (Techniques of the target tracking radar), side lobe blanking and null steering against side lobe jamming (Main lobes, side lobes and back lobes), Doppler discrimination against chaff (Challenges for chaff) and sensor fusion against everything at once (Target acquisition and tracking by IR).

This chapter sets out the thinking behind them. Against jamming, a radar (or weapon system) has three fundamental answers:

  1. Avoid — make sure the jamming power never reaches you: jamming avoidance (Jamming avoidance).
  2. Exploit — use the jammer itself as a beacon: home-on-jamming (Home-on-jamming).
  3. Overpower — simply be stronger than the jammer: burn-through (Overpowering the jamming signal).

On top of that, the procedural layer remains just as important: emission discipline (EMCON), frequency planning, switching between sensors, and operators trained to recognise jamming rather than ignore it. The best EPM is often an operator who notices that "that target" is not behaving like a target.

Jamming avoidance

In plain terms

A jammer can only jam a frequency it knows. If the radar keeps jumping to a different frequency, the jammer is always one step behind.

In practice

Modern radars hop per burst or even per pulse. A spot jammer cannot keep up and has to switch to wideband noise, which makes its power per channel a factor of 10–100 weaker. Tactical radios use the same principle (FHSS and DSSS).

Jamming avoidance is the most elegant defence: the jamming power never (effectively) gets into your receiver. After all, a jammer can only jam what it knows and can follow — so you make your signal unpredictable in every dimension:

The common denominator: every jamming technique needs knowledge — frequency, timing, waveform, direction or scan pattern. Avoidance means systematically making that knowledge worthless. That is why modern radars are "agile in everything": frequency, PRF, waveform and beam.

Home-on-jamming

Home-on-jam (HOJ) reverses the roles: the jammer that wants to blind your radar is itself a powerful, continuously transmitting RF source — a beacon. A radar-guided missile that loses its echo in the noise can switch to passive homing on the jamming signal itself (compare passive homing, Passive homing): the seeker measures the direction from which the jamming arrives and steers towards it.

Why this is such a powerful lever:

Related but distinct: the anti-radiation missile (Passive homing) homes on the opponent's radar; HOJ is a mode of an anti-air or anti-ship weapon that homes on its target's jammer. The principle is identical — whoever transmits can be found — and it is the reason why emitting in an EW environment is always a trade-off and never free.

Overpowering the jamming signal

In plain terms

At long range the jammer wins, because its signal only travels one way. As the target comes closer, the real echo grows faster than the jamming and the radar sees through it again.

In practice

For an aircraft relying only on its own jammer, the last kilometres towards an air defence site are therefore the most dangerous. The defender knows this too: keep tracking the target, because the closer it gets, the better the radar can see.

The third way is brute force: make sure the real echo is stronger than the jamming in your receiver — burn-through. Physics is on the radar's side once the range becomes short enough (Inverse square law, Radar Jamming): the echo grows with 1/R⁴, the jamming signal only with 1/R². As the radar closes on the target, the echo therefore grows faster than the jamming; the crossover point is called the burn-through range:

J/S ∝ R²  ⇒  within Rburn-through, S > J the exact value depends on the radar's transmit power and gain, the jammer's ERP, the target's RCS and the radar's processing gain

The radar can actively push that burn-through range outwards — anything that raises S or lowers the effective J counts:

Operationally, burn-through means: jamming buys time and distance, not invulnerability. The EOB planner calculates at what range each radar will see through the friendly jamming, and the attacker plans his route and weapon employment within the window that the jamming buys. Conversely, the defender knows: the closer the target gets, the more physics works for him — hold on and keep building the track until the echo is back.