EW Academy · Contents · Chapter 14 · §14.9 · Nederlandse versie

§14.9 Protection and anti-jam

Open §14.9 in the academy

Protecting GNSS (the EPM side, Electronic Protective Measures, applied to navigation) works in layers. No single measure is enough on its own; together they raise the J/S threshold and close the spoofing back doors. The antenna is the first and often the most powerful line of defence — hence the distinction between FRPA and CRPA.

FRPA — Fixed Reception Pattern Antenna

A FRPA (Fixed Reception Pattern Antenna) is the ordinary GNSS antenna: a single element with a fixed, roughly hemispherical reception pattern that looks upwards to see all the satellites. It is the small "patch" or mushroom you see on practically every vehicle, aircraft and device.

The FRPA is fine for civil and low-threat use, but it offers little against targeted jamming. For that you need an antenna that actively adapts: the CRPA.

CRPA — Controlled Reception Pattern Antenna

A CRPA (Controlled Reception Pattern Antenna) is an array of several antenna elements (typically 4 to 7) with an adaptive processor behind it. By combining the signals of the elements in phase and amplitude, the CRPA can shape its reception pattern in real time — exactly the same principle as adaptive null steering in radar antennas (Main lobes, side lobes and back lobes). Two methods, often combined:

CRPA array sat sat jammer null towards jammer
The CRPA steers a deep null in the direction of the jammer while the satellites overhead remain visible.
Key difference

FRPA = fixed pattern (one element, cannot adapt). CRPA = controlled pattern (several elements + processor, steers nulls towards jammers and beams towards satellites). The CRPA is the direct navigation application of the phased-array null steering from Main lobes, side lobes and back lobes.

Real-world example (2026, unverified)

Ukrainian sources (Militarnyi, Aug. 2026) report that the Gerbera and Geran seeker variants now carry a 12-element Kometa-M antenna — in principle a CRPA — combined with a system for automatic target detection and tracking that lets the drone steer itself to the target even after losing the operator link. If this is correct, it undermines the assumption that losing the C2/GNSS link stops a drone or forces it to "return to home" (see The two links to attack/17.4) — terminal guidance then becomes independent of the link. Source: Militarnyi, via a Ukrainian volunteer — not yet independently confirmed, but quoted by EW analyst Serhii "Flash" Beskrestnov.

Other protective measures

The antenna is the first layer; around it lies a whole package, just like the layered self-protection package against missiles (Electronic Counter Measures):

Real-world example — Maiachnia (Ukraine, 2026)

A concrete example of "alternative PNT" in practice: Ukraine's Maiachnia system (Skyline platform) is a chain of autonomous radio beacons along the Black Sea coast, from Ochakiv to Izmail. Interceptor drones (including the Wovkulaka Spitfire and the Techno Taras system) navigate by triangulating on these beacons and can thus return and find targets despite heavy Russian GPS jamming over the Black Sea. Reported results: record interceptions of Russian Orlan reconnaissance drones at 110 km and 86 km from the coast. Sources: Euromaidan Press / Militarnyi, Aug. 2026 — RU Mil Tracker.

Layering

The lesson is the same as everywhere in this discipline: no single measure stands alone. A CRPA buys suppression, M code buys resilience and authenticity, INS buys time, and multi-constellation buys breadth. Together they push the burn-through boundary (Overpowering the jamming signal) inwards and close the spoofing door.